Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:22:44 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve,
I have no experience with the Kakko units. However, my favorite PTH de-soldering systems is by far the old Pace (was MBT) glass tube units. I find the newer cardboard tube versions aren't as effective. But I'll opine that each unit's performance is directly related to the level of daily maintenance it gets. My experience has been the units on the production floor sit gathering dust in favor of the Soldapulit hand de-solderers. If I'm on the floor the first thing I would have to do is do a full cleaning before using the tool.
But then I'm a fussy curmudgeon.
Phil
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 12:01 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Through-hole rework station...
Hi All,
For through-hole rework stations, I've always been a AirVac PCBRM guy.
But I'm being asked to look at a Hakko 485, mainly because of the price.
I've never worked with the system, but from what I see in the online
literature, it seems very bare bones and might be okay for very basic
kind of through-hole rework on very simple assemblies.
Have any of you ever worked with this Hakko unit? Am I off-base with my
assessment? My thinking is that there is a very good reason that it is
inexpensive...
Steve
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|