TECHNET Archives

November 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Gerry Gagnon <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Nov 2013 10:22:39 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (117 lines)
Joyce,
 
I think you nailed it.
 
Immersion coatings have excellent copper coverage characteristices (due to displacement reactions) but are also VERY thin. If you push for higher deposit thickness (like everyone always wants) you get issues.
 
Victor, you could run an SEM and energy dispersive x-ray map of the surface and pin it to the patent.
 
XRF as you've been advised is a fun task indeed. This is probably a new formulation, so there might be issues finding good cal standards for the XRF. I think our friend George O'Brien would have something useful to say on XRF for you if he's lurking.
 
Good hunting,
 
Gerry
 

 
> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:17:22 +0000
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Final Surface finish
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> Whiskeys free immersion tin coating?  Like this? 
>  http://www.google.com/patents/EP2494094A2
> 
> Joyce Koo
> Researcher
> Materials Interconnect Lab
> Office: (519) 888-7465 79945
> BlackBerry: (226) 220-4760
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Victor Hernandez
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:03 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Final Surface finish
> 
> This final surface finish does NOT appear to be a HASL process.  Unless, the air knives pressure was so high that it did not leave ANY RIPPLES of the copper pad surface.
> Victor,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mike Fenner
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:52 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Final Surface finish
> 
> Theoretically also PB-free HASL, I say theoretically because the usual alloy is Sn/Cu or modified Sn/Cu on cost grounds.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mike Fenner
> Bonding Services & Products
> M: +44 [0] 7810 526 317
> T: +44 [0] 1865 522 663
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of GRIVON Arnaud
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 5:19 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Final Surface finish
> 
> Immersion Tin?
> Ag is known to be the anti-whisker additive for most chemistries.
> Best regards,
> 
> Arnaud Grivon
> PCB/PCBA Technology Expert
> Thales Global Services - ESS (Engineering Shared Services) 18, avenue du Maréchal Juin Bât. C - Bureau C2-135
> 92366 Meudon-la-Forêt Cedex
> France
> Tél : (+33) (0)1 70 28 23 88
> 
> Visit our website : http://www.thalesgroup.com
> 
> [@@ THALES GROUP INTERNAL @@]
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] De la part de Victor Hernandez Envoyé : mercredi 20 novembre 2013 18:15 À : [log in to unmask] Objet : [TN] Final Surface finish
> 
> Fellow TechNetters:
> 
>    Is there a final surface finish which has a high tin content along with
> some silver.   It is not the traditional ImAg.   The finish appears somewhat
> dull with good coverage on the edges of copper features.
> 
> Victor,
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
 		 	   		  

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2