TECHNET Archives

November 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:08:03 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
UV-Ozone Cleaning Processes
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
Are any of you familiar with UV-Ozone cleaning processes?  I am considering using Plasma to clean some PCA's prior to coating to improve wetting of coatings, but now wonder if I should also consider UV-Ozone.



Anyone care to state some pros and cons of each for my application?



Suprisingly enough, I don't see any mention of UV-Ozone cleaning in the IPC -CH65B handbook.



Thanks

Rich Kraszewski / Plexus





______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2