RPN: reverse polish natation; no need for the '=' sign.
Still got them and use them!
Ahne.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Inge Hernefjord
Sent: 6 October, 2013 14:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] NTC for today
Thouse with building stacks, yes.
4(2+3)
2
3
+
4
x
= 20
Inge
On 6 October 2013 03:38, Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The old HP calculators had masked ROM for code and a little RAM for temps.
> I recall.
>
> I do remember stories about code simulation because of the ROM expense.
>
> Bob K.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Creswick
> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 9:07 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] NTC for today
>
> Did each station monitor a different set/piece of telemetry?
>
>
>
> My HP calculators likely had as much processing ability as the LEM
> computer.
> Weren't they still using core memory as well?
>
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> From: Inge Hernefjord [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 5:13 PM
> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Steven Creswick
> Subject: Re: [TN] NTC for today
>
>
>
> I'm afraid it's not a space plane but just a plan.
> Actually, there is something I always wonder about. Go back to Neil
> Amstrong and that time...Apollo, for instance. The computers at that
> time were simple, compared to today's machines. I know, because I
> passed a glass box every day before I entered the clean rooms. In that
> box was Apollo's main computer, which we built. Lot's of transistors,
> most TO-18 and TO-5.
> Specked
> with 2N1893, 2121, 2902, which were very popular. Back to the
> path.....as I said, very simple stuff. The main functions were 'small
> push/pull rockets and main rockets, as long as the service module and
> the astronaut capsule were together. And communication radios. And
> sensors of various nature...but in alles rather uncomplicated
> electronics. My question: The central station in Houston was a large
> room with lots and lots of work stations. A hundred persons "worked"
> there, all with their noses close to the many large computer
> displays.Why was it necessary with such many work stations?
>
> Inge
>
>
>
> On 5 October 2013 20:13, Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>
>
> I read somewhere that Sweden is making a spaceplane. How about a ride
> on that, and play the Blue Danube?!!!
>
>
>
> Have a good time cruising!
>
>
>
> steve
>
>
>
> From: Inge Hernefjord [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 1:17 PM
> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Steven Creswick
>
> Subject: Re: [TN] NTC for today
>
>
>
>
> Thank you, buddy,
> take care ya'self.
>
> Inge
>
>
>
> On 5 October 2013 02:43, Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> It's probably already tomorrow there, but happy belated birthday Inge!
>
> Steve
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ed Popielarski
> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:32 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] NTC for today
>
> It's Ingemar Hernefjord's birthday today!
>
> Happy Birthday, Inge!
>
> Ed Popielarski
> Engineering Manager
>
> [Description: FullLogo]
> 970 NE 21st Ct.
> Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277
>
> Ph: 360-675-1322
> Fx: 206-624-0965
> Cl: 949-581-6601
>
> https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en
>
> <https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en
> <
>
https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.
> 011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A> &ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.
> 011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A>
> &ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.0
>
> 11188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
