TECHNET Archives

October 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:03:54 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Hi all, 

We would like to solder a thin gold foil, with some magic on top, to a PWB.


The foil and pad are round, about 560 um in diameter. 

We want the solder connection to end up less than 25 um thick.  So, we are
trying to print with a 50um thick stencil, and 20% reduction, the stencil
aperture is 460 um diameter.  So, area ratio, or aspect ratio look great,
printing shouldn't be a problem.  

 

Print results were inconsistent.  

 

This morning I realize that many of solder paste spheres are over half the
thickness of the stencil.  And the rule of thumb that five spheres should
fit across the aperture for good paste release.   Well, what about the
thickness of the stencil versus the diameter of the spheres? 

 

Has anyone out there wrestled with this problem?  Maybe I should be using a
thicker stencil, and push the aspect ratio a bit more. 

 

Thoughts? 

 



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2