TECHNET Archives

August 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 14 Aug 2013 12:10:11 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Where was the wicking photo place at for viewing.   Neg/Pos etch back always interest me.   Where can I learn more about the creation of this artifact in the PWB/PCB plating process.

Victor,

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 9:23 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] [IPC-600-6012] Wicking Requirement IPC 6012B/3A vs 6013C/3A

Better now than when asking for type AB- negative blood. 
Dewey
-----Original Message-----
From: IPC-600-6012 [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of karl sauter
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 4:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [IPC-600-6012] Wicking Requirement IPC 6012B/3A vs 6013C/3A

Typo - 0.5 mils not inches.


On 8/13/2013 4:00 PM, Bill Ortloff wrote:
> Karl,
> Do you really mean 0.5 inches?
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: karl sauter [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 08/13/2013 02:38 PM MST
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: [IPC-600-6012] Wicking Requirement IPC 6012B/3A vs 
> 6013C/3A
>
>
>
> Pete,
>
> Would be good to have crossection slightly micro-etched in order to 
> show the demarcation between inner layer foil and PTH plated copper at 
> the interconnect.  Then can distinguish between extent of etchback 
> from extent of Cu wicking.
>
> Etchback of more than 0.5 inches suggests excessive and/or non-uniform 
> desmear.
>
> Regards,
> Karl Sauter
> Oracle Corporation
>
>
> On 8/13/2013 2:19 PM, Pete Menuez wrote:
>> Hello All -
>>   This isn't the best picture but it is all I have.
>>   This cross section is being evaluated to IPC 6012 Rev B Class 3A 
>> and is being rejected for wicking in excess 2 mils.  Is this, in you 
>> all's opinion, wicking or is this the effect of plasma etch/resin 
>> removal/glass etch and not wicking?  How should this be evaluated 
>> under B/3A?
>>   How would this be evaluated in 6012 Rev C Class 3A?  Could you even 
>> evaluate it since this is before etch?
>>   Comments are greatly appreciated.  Btw, I'm not trying to save 
>> anything.
>> This panel has already been scrapped out - I have a presentation with 
>> my customer and I'd like to offer more opinion than just my own and 
>> the board fab.
>>     Thanks,
>> Pete
>>                       Peter Menuez
>> Supplier Quality Engineering Manager
>> L-3 Communications Cincinnati Electronics
>> 7500 Innovation Way
>> Mason, Ohio 45040
>> [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> 513-573-6401 Voice
>> 513-767-3778 Cell
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> _ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud 
>> service.
>> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
>> [log in to unmask] 
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> _
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2