TECHNET Archives

August 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Reuven Rokah <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:53:14 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (151 lines)
Can you detail the other components on the PCB assembly? from small to
biggest...


On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hmm, you are living dangerously.  You do need good control to make sure it
> all melted at same time, unless it is very few C4s.  you possibly looking
> at very aggressive flux since your reflow tool is not optimal. No
> recommendation here.
>
> Joyce Koo
> Researcher
> Materials Interconnect Lab
> Office: (519) 888-7465 79945
> BlackBerry: (226) 220-4760
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:25 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] Flip Chips
>
> I forgot to mention that I have no nitrogen oven.  I am thinking of buying
> a rapid response hot plate and putting that inside of a big vacuum bell
> jar.  If I go through several vacuum purge cycles I should be able to get
> to 100ppm O2 in less than a half hour.  Anybody done that?  Recommendations
> for hot plates?  How about recommendations for O2 meters which go down to
> that level?
>
> Wayne
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Wayne Thayer
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 1:00 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: [TN] Flip Chips
>
> OK, Inge, you've inspired me to share what I'm up to presently:
>
> I'm trying to prove out an in-house flip chip attach/underfill process.
>  I'll get the die from Practical Components and/or Topline, most likely
> 10mil pitch full array, although Practical also reps a PacTech 200x400
> micron array which sounds pretty good too.  Looks like SnPb would be
> special order, so I'll do SAC305.
>
> I'm disappointed to see that the boards they stock for these are all OSP,
> which means that in initial development anyway, that I'll have to cut the
> test board in sections.
>
> Any advice from the "school of hard knocks" for me?  Preferred
> fluxes/underfills?  Good stories maybe?
>
> Wayne
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Inge Hernefjord
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 12:47 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] test
>
> What is (not) going on?  No conversation. No problems. No fun stories.
> Nothing at all. Technet's death-throes?
>
> Inge
>
>
> On 26 August 2013 15:26, Steven Creswick <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> > Ah, but here in the mid-west, the cicada's are rubbing their legs
> > together ...
> >
> > Steve C
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Inge Hernefjord
> > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 6:21 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [TN] test
> >
> > Silent as Nevada desert.
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> > For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
> > [log in to unmask]
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public
> information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>



-- 

Best Regards,

*Reuven Rokah*

Mobile: 972-52-6012018
Tel:        972-3-9360688
Fax:          076-5100674
 <http://www.rokah-technologies.com/>[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
www.rokah-technologies.com

**
This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains
information which is CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary of Rokah
Technologies. If you have received this transmission in error, please
inform me by e-mail, phone or fax, and then please delete all of the
original files and all other copies exist.


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2