TECHNET Archives

July 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Leland Woodall <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 18:18:20 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Folks,

We run thousands of boards a day, and almost every one carries a BGA.  We inspect each with inline X-ray.

Last week, we had one single ball to fail for a 30% void and an oversize diameter.  We contacted the supplier, and they said their process was incapable of sending out such a defect.

We've never had a void over 5%, and even those are incredibly rare.

What within our process might have caused this, and do you agree with the statement of the supplier?  How do you recommend we analyze the failure?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Leland

________________________________

“Confidentiality Notice:
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information belonging to the sender and is intended only for the use of the party or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, retention or the taking of action in reliance on the contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender and erase all information and attachments.”

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2