Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 3 Jun 2013 07:26:37 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Louis - I am in agreement with George Wenger, on ENIG you are soldering
to the nickel plating and not the copper plating. Unless the nickel
plating was impacted by a copper plating condition (i.e. porosity,
adhesion, etc.), it is not clear why the nickel wouldn't be the
controlling surface impacting solderability. What solderability test
results led you to suspect the copper plating is playing a role in your
float tests?
Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]
From: Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 05/31/2013 02:19 PM
Subject: [TN] solderability factors
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
TechNetters, In concert with colleagues, I have been conducting
experiments to identify and assess the relative influence of some process
factors and parameters on the performance of printed circuit boards with
ENIG final finish in the J-STD-003B solder float test of S coupons.
These experiments have led me to conclude, or at least suspect, that the
plated copper, on which the ENIG is deposited, has a highly significant
impact on performance in the solder float test.
We have a DC copper plating line along with a Reverse Pulse copper plating
line. Experimental results show significant difference in solder float
testing between the lines. I had been looking at the book by Humpston and
Jacobsen, Principles of Soldering, after having spent some time with the
TechNet-referenced books by Manko and Klein-Wassink.
Humpston and Jacobsen's book, in the 2nd of the two chapters I read so
far, appears to say plating technique can affect solderability. Maybe I'm
misinterpreting something, since I'm often reading these things around 11
PM.
Anyone in the TechNet world able to help me understand if and how DC
copper might solder differently from Reverse Pulse copper, after ENIG
deposition?
Louis Hart
Compunetics
Monroeville, PA
USA
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
412-858-1232
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|