TECHNET Archives

June 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 17:54:00 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (345 lines)
Where is the hub of cosmic space? Where is your fixed registration 
point? Sorry, your analogy does not satisfy me. If the helix speculation 
(not even a hypothesis) were true, everything in the universe would 
describe a spiral, right down to the electrons round the atoms in your 
brain (and I mean before you reach your fridge, not after)

Btian

On 16.06.2013 17:05, Inge Hernefjord wrote:
> Hmmm.....Let Sun be the hub in your bycycle wheel and the air valve be
> Earth, then place the bycycle on one of the blades of a wind power
> station. In this system, the air valve will�touch a switch and a lamp,
> both are fixed�to the bycycle frame. By doing continous measurements,
> you can see that the hub, the air valve and the�lamp do not change
> position�vs each other.�Each time it passes the switch the lamp blinks
> and an immediate vector measurement is done. The computing says that the
> air valve rotates perfectly around the hub. To get the air valve
> deviate, you would need to manipulate the strong forces (the spokes)
> that keep the wheel together as one and the same physical status. Even a
> very small deviation of the spokes would cause dangerous situations,
> even risk that the whole bycycle collapses. Very accurate measurements
> would reveal microscopical changes due to wear in the bearings and
> fatigue in the metals, but over shorter intervals, the changes are
> neglidgible. If you registered the air valve position vs. time, �from a
> fixed position on the windmill's blade, you would get xyz values and a
> time axis. If these were presented per second, you would get the
> imagination of a spiral. If you place the windmill on the deck of a
> carrier that runs in a circle with a fixed registration point deck vs
> windmill blade, you'd get a spiral too. You get a small spiral modified
> by a larger spiral modified by a larger spiral etc. The longer from the
> bycycle system, the larger screen is needed, if you don't use a
> exponential scale. In the video, it seems as if the spectator
> (registering unit) is placed in Orion. The video does not represent
> physical maps for orientation but course of events.
> �
> For me, all this is rather meaningless, I'm more interested in finding
> my way to the fridge. I'm sure I never go in spirals to find it but make
> very regular returns to exactly same fridgerator.
>
>
> On 16 June 2013 01:57, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>     How do you define position in universal space? I realise that
>     helical movement sounds logical but it ain't if you think about it
>     and astronomers deny this speculation. Astronomy is far too complex
>     a science for little me to even start to understand.
>
>     Don't forget that gravity is still a theory but don't sit under an
>     apple tree!
>
>     Brian
>
>
>     On 16.06.2013 11:32, Inge Hernefjord wrote:
>
>         Awesome! Never been thinking that way. So, for a observer with a
>         fixed
>         position in the universe, our planet never never returns to the same
>         position. The conclusion is that NOTHING returns to same place,
>         because all
>         systems move.
>
>         Inge
>
>
>         On 15 June 2013 22:48, Pat Goodyear <[log in to unmask]
>         <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>             Want to see a cool concept of our solar system and our
>             galaxy check out in
>             youtube �the videos by DJSanhu here is one link
>             http://www.youtube.com/watch?*__*v=C4V-ooITrws
>             <http://www.youtube.com/watch?**v=C4V-ooITrws><http://www.__youtube.com/watch?v=C4V-__ooITrws
>             <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4V-ooITrws>> �Gives one
>             something to think about.
>
>
>
>             pat
>
>
>             On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Stadem, Richard D. wrote:
>
>             � This was a great string until it got gory. :-)
>
>
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]
>                 <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Ed Popielarski
>                 Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 1:37 PM
>                 To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>                 Subject: Re: [TN] NTC: too coestions
>
>                 Oh my, this is starting to sound more and more like it
>                 has been narrated
>                 by Morgan Freeman!
>
>                 When we consider that the universe is indeed expanding
>                 and that expansion
>                 is accelerating, there is proof the system is dynamic
>                 and always in motion.
>                 This leads us to the existence of dark matter and dark
>                 energy, this tightly
>                 coupled to the TOE (theory of everything), but c'mon
>                 guys, it's Friday and
>                 I really don't want to think that hard!
>
>                 But, therein lies indirect proof that Al Gore invented
>                 the internet. He
>                 cryptically encoded the theory of everything in the
>                 spelling of "potatoe",
>                 a cleverly hidden acronym for the "Postulate Of The
>                 Assertable Theory Of
>                 Everything". Brilliant man, he was.
>
>
>                 Ed Popielarski
>                 Engineering Manager
>
>
>                 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 970 NE 21st Ct.
>                 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277
>
>                 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �Ph: 360-675-1322
>                 <tel:360-675-1322>
>                 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �Fx: 206-624-0965
>                 <tel:206-624-0965>
>                 � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �Cl: 949-581-6601
>                 <tel:949-581-6601>
>
>
>                 https://maps.google.com/maps/*__*myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-__**
>                 <https://maps.google.com/maps/**myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-**>
>                 122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.**__033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=__**A<https://maps.google.com/__maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.__315753,-122.643578&spn=0.__011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=__16&iwloc=A
>                 <https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A>>
>
>
>
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]
>                 <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
>                 Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 11:17 AM
>                 To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>                 Subject: Re: [TN] NTC: too coestions
>
>                 Very good. Weight and mass only exist with respect to
>                 gravity and
>                 movement (time). In space there is no gravity, so if you
>                 hang the
>                 individual planets in a big basket, they will weigh
>                 nothing with respect to
>                 space as a whole, or they will weigh a varying weight
>                 with respect to where
>                 they are in the continuum as related to the mass of
>                 other bodies traveling
>                 nearby. But nobody knows the constant of time (Tk)with
>                 respect to the
>                 universe, ie, if the great God Inge were to hold the
>                 scale, is he standing
>                 still in the continuum, or is there, in fact, no static
>                 universe, such that
>                 Inge is never standing still, but time revolves around
>                 and through him? Or
>                 does the great God Inge only think he is standing still,
>                 while the universe
>                 in its ultimate infinity whirls around him as if he was
>                 but a piece of dust?
>
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]
>                 <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Inge Hernefjord
>                 Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 12:47 PM
>                 To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>                 Subject: Re: [TN] NTC: too coestions
>
>                 Deer Tecnet,
>
>                 Hou can you saj so and so meny kilos. On scool I teached
>                 myselv that
>                 somesing weiht becaose of it is draw to the centre of
>                 earth, a hazelnutt, a
>                 ass, about or a women, all are relatez to pull powder of
>                 eart. Now, watt is
>                 this plannet �related too? The eart must be in a
>                 ballance cup or hang in a
>                 spring, then yo can saj hou much this plannet weighted.
>
>                 Eina
>
>
>                 On 14 June 2013 05:00, Steven Creswick
>                 <[log in to unmask]
>                 <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
>                 � Good one Denny!
>
>
>                     Have you been dipping into Doug's Dew?
>
>
>                     For the earth-moon distance, it would be a matter of
>                     calculating a new
>                     Lagrangian point for a closer moon-earth orbit -
>                     right? �At the Lagrangian
>                     Pt, her body would be equally attracted to the earth
>                     and moon, so she might
>                     have to jump just a bit to get on the moon-side of
>                     the L Pt.
>
>                     Must be some equations for that.
>
>                     Steve C
>
>                     -----Original Message-----
>                     From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]
>                     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Dennis Fritz
>                     Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 7:43 AM
>                     To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>                     Subject: Re: [TN] NTC: too coestions
>
>                     1. Eartha massa issa 5.972E24 kg
>
>                     2, Canna fly me to da moona - es only inna song.
>
>                     Denny
>
>
>
>                     -----Original Message-----
>                     From: Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]
>                     <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>                     To: TechNet <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>                     Sent: Fri, Jun 14, 2013 5:11 am
>                     Subject: [TN] NTC: too coestions
>
>
>                     Gud Morning,
>                     it was Fridai and I had too cuestions. Thei are not
>                     imported. For you
>                     not mportent.
>                     1. How much did this plannet weighted?
>                     2. How cluse must Moon came to the our �plannet to
>                     pull me avay so I can
>                     ly?
>                     It was not very intresting to knew. Thank for a goud
>                     anser. No.
>                     Eina Steina
>
>                     ________________________________**________________________________**
>
>                     _________
>                     his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>                     Security.cloud service.
>                     or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960
>                     or [log in to unmask]
>                     **________________________________**_________
>
>
>
>                     ________________________________**________________________________**
>
>                     __________
>                     This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>                     Security.cloud service.
>                     For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>                     [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>                     ________________________________**
>                     ________________________________**__________
>
>
>
>                     ________________________________**________________________________**
>
>                     __________
>                     This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>                     Security.cloud service.
>                     For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>                     [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>                     ________________________________**
>                     ________________________________**__________
>
>
>
>                 ________________________________**________________________________**
>
>                 __________
>                 This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>                 Security.cloud service.
>                 For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>                 [log in to unmask]
>                 **________________________________**__________
>
>                 ________________________________**________________________________**
>
>                 __________
>                 This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>                 Security.cloud service.
>                 For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>                 [log in to unmask]
>                 **________________________________**__________
>
>                 ________________________________**________________________________**
>
>                 __________
>                 This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>                 Security.cloud service.
>                 For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>                 [log in to unmask]
>                 **________________________________**__________
>
>                 ________________________________**________________________________**
>
>                 __________
>                 This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>                 Security.cloud service.
>                 For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>                 [log in to unmask]
>                 **________________________________**__________
>
>
>             ________________________________**________________________________**__________
>
>             This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
>             Security.cloud service.
>             For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>             [log in to unmask]
>             **________________________________**__________
>
>
>
>         __________________________________________________________________________
>         This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
>         service.
>         For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
>         [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>         __________________________________________________________________________
>
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2