TECHNET Archives

May 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 9 May 2013 07:40:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Good morning all,

Another conformal coating related question.  What, from an assembly point 
of view, would you tell a board designer are good design practices to make 
an assembly coatable from an automated standpoint.

I think we would all agree that having an assembly with no keep out zones 
and a constant height for components to be the ideal.  The more holes we 
poke in the film and the farther we get from the ideal, the less we can 
automate coating.

So, what would you tell a designer to do?

Or, to put the shoe on the other hand, what kinds of things should they 
NOT do, or bad practices to avoid?

And, yes, I know It Depends.

Doug Pauls


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2