TECHNET Archives

May 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"lduso - Diamond-MT.com" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, lduso - Diamond-MT.com
Date:
Fri, 3 May 2013 10:31:32 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
Lamar

I've never received a request like that yet. We use your dimer for our
Mil-Spec requirements and as long as you are on the QPL our customers are
satisfied. Hell, I've received a request for that info from any of our
liquid customers either. It blows me away how I receive brand new designs
that are still calling for Mil-Spec as it is.

Lloyd Duso
Diamond-MT
Plant Manager
(814) 535-3505
www.Diamond-mt.com


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Lamar Young <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Suppliers and users of conformal coatings,
>
> I've recently had a request for the Mil-I-46058 Group A test results
> (Group A tests includes Cure Time & Temperature, Appearance, and
> Thickness) to be added to a coatings C of A.  I have a concern that adding
> this information will cause some confusion among those not familiar with
> the Mil-Spec, such as that the Thickness result will somehow be
> interpreted to be a type of qualitative property of the coating.
> The coating is tested to 46058 and is on the QPL.
>
> I have been in the coating industry for 20+ years and in direct support of
> our coatings for the last 10 years.  This is the first request that we've
> had for this information.  Therefore, I am trying to understand if this is
> a unique request or if others in the military community are thinking of
> also adding these results as a Cert requirement.
>
> Suppliers/manufacturers - have you received similar requests for reporting
> the Group A results?
>
> Users - do you have internal requirements to obtain Group A results?  Or,
> do you have future plans for requesting this data?  Are you aware of any
> new requirements that would drive this request?
>
> It seems odd to me to receive a request for this information now, almost
> 15 years after the Mil-Spec was declared inactive for new product design.
>
> Thanks in advance for your input and comments.
>
> Lamar Young
> Specialty Coating Systems, Inc.
> 7645 Woodland Dr.
> Indianapolis, IN 46278
> (317) 244-1200 Ext. 276
> www.scscoatings.com
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2