TECHNET Archives

May 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Tue, 21 May 2013 16:12:30 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Or reduce the amount of flux going into the system. Overspraying or excessive flux drag-out can lead to the foaming.
Sometimes if excessive rework is being done with a lot of tacky flux, etc, you will encounter foaming.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Another Closed-loop cleaner question...

Morning all,

 

I may have already asked this once, and I think I know the answer, but I'll ask anyway.

 

It's not a good idea to use defoamers in a closed-loop cleaner, right?

 

If we're getting too much foam in the wash tank, we should add another carbon bed, correct?

 

Thanks to any who reply,

 

Steve Gregory

 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2