TECHNET Archives

May 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 21 May 2013 10:49:56 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
Steve,
You might want to give Mike Bixenman or Dave Lober at Kyzen a call.  Foam 
in the wash tank is often related to the temperature of the bath, and 
there is a "foam zone" between too hot and too cold where foam is easily 
generated.  Going a little hotter in the wash temp may eliminate much of 
the foaming.

Doug Pauls



From:   Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>
Date:   05/21/2013 10:06 AM
Subject:        [TN] Another Closed-loop cleaner question...
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



Morning all,

 

I may have already asked this once, and I think I know the answer, but
I'll ask anyway.

 

It's not a good idea to use defoamers in a closed-loop cleaner, right?

 

If we're getting too much foam in the wash tank, we should add another
carbon bed, correct?

 

Thanks to any who reply,

 

Steve Gregory

 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2