TECHNET Archives

May 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 17 May 2013 18:16:37 +0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Good evening, all!

I personally would be very sceptical, indeed, of ANY w/s mask in a 
closed loop system. It is asking for reduced lifetime of carbon and/or 
DI columns. I would suggest open loop pre-cleaning and use the closed 
loop just to polish off. Alternatively, a membrane microfilter before 
the first column, but this will require frequent backwash de-clogging.

Brian

On 17.05.2013 16:08, Steve Gregory wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> Continuing on with the masking thread, I know Techspray has a water soluble mask that is supposed to be compatible with closed-loop water treatment systems, are there any others out there?
>
> Any pros/cons of using them?
>
> As always, thanks in advance!
>
> Steve
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2