TECHNET Archives

May 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 May 2013 13:32:27 -0700
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Ahne Oosterhof <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (69 lines)
A repair is due to damage. Rework is due to assembly error.
A thought from Mike Bogden, Engineer

My follow up on that thought: "Rework" is "Repair waiting to be needed".
===

Why wait for a "standard" to do tracking of rework and repair? The
requirement exists in-house.
The better you track both of these, the better and quicker you can fix these
problems in order to improve quality and bottom line.
It helps if you determine the cost of each individual of these problems so
that you can tackle the most costly ones first. And cost should include time
to analyze cause of the problem, determining frequency of problem, cost of
component involved, cost of time lost, maybe even the cost impact of field
failures (hard to put a number on).

Ahne.

PS: I have stated before: some people are very proud of their rework
department, but should not be of the fact they need one.



-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Stadem, Richard D.
Sent: 15 May, 2013 06:53
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Trend Analysis of Repair Usage

I am trying to find out if there is an industry requirement or
recommendation that usage of Repair Procedures be tracked and monitored? I
could not find any information on this in IPC-7711/7721. In previous lives
the number of repair usages was tracked, and pareto was published quarterly
(number of repairs used versus number of total CCAs built, number of repairs
used by a given CCA part number, number of repairs associated with a given
component part number, etc.) .
Because repairs are infrequent, it is not easy to detect any trend in their
usage, but over time the trend analysis can provide good data to detect root
causes.
I just want to know if there is any industry standard that covers this.
I am talking about repairs, not rework. If you don't know the difference
please do not respond.
Thanks
dean

This message and/or attachments may include information subject to GDC4S
S.P. 1.8.6 and GD Corporate Policy 07-105 and are intended to be accessed
only by authorized recipients. Use, storage and transmission are governed by
General Dynamics and its policies. Contractual restrictions apply to third
parties. Recipients should refer to the policies or contract to determine
proper handling. Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is
prohibited. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender
and destroy all copies of the original message.




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2