TECHNET Archives

May 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dave Schaefer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 May 2013 12:25:38 -0400
Reply-To:
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
From:
Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
In-Reply-To:
Organization:
Index Designs
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi,

 Hmmmmm, I smell bad math.  (Smells like Hog Wash if I remember correctly!)  :-)

 If you line produces 10% bad device (90% yield which is pretty bad depending on what you are building) and your ICT coverage is only 90% you will have a 1% rate of failure going out the door. 

Bob K.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dave Schaefer
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 11:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] ICT Coverage

If ICT is your only or primary test strategy then anything less than 100% coverage is unacceptable.

Would you want tell your customers you are 90% certain the product you are delivering works?

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2