TECHNET Archives

April 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Butane Soldering Irons
From:
"Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)
Date:
Thu, 4 Apr 2013 21:10:20 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (113 lines) 
Waxing nostalgically about wickedly burning the candle at both ends, while immensely illuminating diminishes the perceived overall enlightenment.
Dewey
 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Inge Hernefjord
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 1:46 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Butane Soldering Irons

Excuse me, sir, but can a flame be old ? Let's light a candel. The flame is brightening your face and will burn until ether you distinguish it or it continuouses until the stearine is consumed, then it dies. The question is when is it an old flame? It's not when the candel is consumed, because then it is not a flame. Is 'old' a question of a certain time after the lightening, then where on the time scale is it regarded as 'old' ? Old means per definition that a function is no longer 100%. In the case of the candel, it usually burns with an equal brightness all from the start to the end of fuel. I look forward to your answer with great interest.

Inge


On 4 April 2013 21:51, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dewey was burned by an old flame, so he is hot on the topic......
>
> Doug Pauls
>
>
>
> From:   "Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <[log in to unmask]>
> To:     <[log in to unmask]>
> Date:   04/04/2013 10:07 AM
> Subject:        Re: [TN] Butane Soldering Irons
> Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
> Et Tu, Butane.
> Dewey
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Ellis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 7:57 AM
> To: TechNet E-Mail Forum; Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)
> Subject: Re: [TN] Butane Soldering Irons
>
> That is a g(h)as-tly remark.
>
> Brian
>
> On 04.04.2013 17:49, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) wrote:
> > In the aftermath, seeking atonement, you'll at least have the burnt
> offerings at hand.
> > Dewey
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gregg Owens
> > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 7:38 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: [TN] Butane Soldering Irons
> >
> > Since we hand solder outside of the normal manufacturing floor, our
> technicians are requesting to use a butane soldering iron. I have no 
> previous experience with this type of soldering iron. With a 
> temperature setting of 1076 F it seems rather high and potentially 
> damaging to resulting solder connection, insulation, people, etc.
> >
> > http://www.apexhandtools.com/brands/CF_Files/model_detail.cfm?upc=03
> > 71
> > 03060976
> >
> > Any thoughts from experience would be most appreciated.
> >
> > Gregg
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> > For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> > [log in to unmask] 
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> > For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> > [log in to unmask] 
> > ____________________________________________________________________
> > __
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
> [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2