TECHNET Archives

April 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Ioan Tempea <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:30:06 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (75 lines)
That's weird Ed, as all defects are related to model points (work stations) so you know precisely where and when this occurred and who created/repaired/closed the defect. Maybe a revision level issue?

Thanks anyways!

Ioan Tempea, ing.
Ingénieur principal de fabrication / Senior Manufacturing Engineer


950 RUE BERGAR, LAVAL, QC, H7L 5A1
T+ 1 (450) 967-7100, EXT244
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauréat Dunamis 2012
Entreprise manufacturière / Gestion du capital humain


-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ed Popielarski [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Envoyé : April-18-13 11:23 AM
À : 'TechNet E-Mail Forum'; Ioan Tempea
Objet : RE: Cable, mechanical and coating defects

Ioan,

I used Aegis in my former employment and one thing that became frustrating is the inability to determine where in the factory a defect was created. As an example, if you dump all "solder bridge" defects into one bucket, you can't discriminate if they occurred at SMT, Wave, Hand Solder, etc. I would create as many defect types categorically, as you can always put them together in one lump afterwards if needed. It's almost impossible or difficult at least, to separate them out after the fact. 

Ed Popielarski
Engineering Manager


                               970 NE 21st Ct.
                              Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277

                              Ph: 360-675-1322
                              Fx: 206-624-0965
                              Cl: 949-581-6601

https://maps.google.com/maps/myplaces?hl=en&ll=48.315753,-122.643578&spn=0.011188,0.033023&ctz=420&t=m&z=16&iwloc=A

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ioan Tempea
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 5:08 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Cable, mechanical and coating defects

Dear Technos,

I'm setting the quality module in our Aegis system. All OK at PCB assembly, but I need suggestions regarding the defects to be logged in the cable, mechanical assembly, test and coating departments.

Any standard covering this? Of course, your personal input would be highly appreciated.

Thanks,

Ioan Tempea, ing.
Ingénieur principal de fabrication / Senior Manufacturing Engineer [signature002]<http://www.digico.cc/>

950 RUE BERGAR, LAVAL, QC, H7L 5A1<http://g.co/maps/2gh3f>
T+ 1 (450) 967-7100, EXT244
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [signature001] <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Digico/277076778479>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lauréat Dunamis 2012<http://digico.cc/dunamis-2012/>
Entreprise manufacturière / Gestion du capital humain


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2