Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="utf-8" |
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:45:19 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
base64 |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello Everyone,
I'm sorry to go to this can of worms again, but whenever the subject comes up I seem to gather equal and opposite advise on whether or not it is better to remove un-used via lands on internal layers.
I normally leave them in unless there is an unusual overriding factor.
This time I am asking specifically with respect to a board that is on the edge of the allowed aspect ratio.
I have some theoretical leanings, but was wondering if anyone can refer to some empirical evidence they've collected that makes the choice more clear.
So, if I'm using a drill size that is getting quite small for the thickness with several internal layers, would it make more sense to leave the internal lands in place (all else being unremarkable: materials, thermal, SI, operating voltages, etc.)?
Thanks for any light you can shed on this.
Richard Hatano
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|