LISTSERV - DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

DESIGNERCOUNCIL Archives

April 2013

DesignerCouncil@IPC.ORG

	LISTSERV Archives
	DESIGNERCOUNCIL Home
	DESIGNERCOUNCIL April 2013

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	RoHS Fabrication Specification - Revisited
From:	Dave Schaefer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	(Designers Council Forum)
Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:37:37 -0500
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (20 lines)

With RoHS2 approaching rapidly and the elimination of exemptions to Category 8 and 9 products I am in the process of reviewing and potentially revamping our PCB Fabrication Specification.

A few questions:
1. Is a reference to Marking Specification J-STD-609A required, or will a simple note requiring the product be clearly identified as RoHS compliant acceptable? Preference?
2. Do you call out specific laminate materials (eg IPC-4101C/126) or is a note referenceing IPC-4101C RoHS compliant material sufficient?
3. Is it necessary to mention "NON-DICY" in the note text, or is that implied by the RoHS requirement mentioned elsewhere within the Fabrication Specification?

Any other thoughts / opnions ?

Thanks,
Dave

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DesignerCouncil Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 16.0.
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF DesignerCouncil.
To temporarily stop/(restart) delivery of DesignerCouncil send: SET DesignerCouncil NOMAIL/(MAIL)
For additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.IPC.ORG