TECHNET Archives

March 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"lduso - Diamond-MT.com" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, lduso - Diamond-MT.com
Date:
Tue, 26 Mar 2013 11:51:03 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
I do not have specific reasons why or why not but I can say of the hundreds
of customers we have had for liquid coating, I can think of only a handful
that demanded it, and less that strictly forbid it. As a normal process we
do not coat the edges unless it has an exposed conductive surface there. I
do know of one customer who forbid it for fitment reasons in a case.

Obviously if it is XY or a dip operation we coat the edges.

Lloyd Duso

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]
> wrote:

> OK, the conformal coat question of the day:
>
> Do you conformally coat the edges of a printed circuit assembly?  Why or
> why not?
>
> OK, that is two questions, or perhaps a half fractional question.....
>
> Doug Pauls
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>



-- 
Lloyd Duso
Diamond-MT
Plant Manager
(814) 535-3505


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2