TECHNET Archives

March 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Stadem, Richard D." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Stadem, Richard D.
Date:
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:29:43 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (100 lines)
There you go again, Doug. Attempting to corrupt the moral values of engineers everywhere by trying to get them to sell pot.

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Douglas Pauls
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 2:29 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Steve,
Let me ask a dumb question - why not just buy a new solder reservoir, save yourself the hassle and labor, and sell the whole pot to a reclaimer?

Doug Pauls



From:   Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>
Date:   03/19/2013 12:11 PM
Subject:        Re: [TN] Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC 
Wave solder machine
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



Thanks Ed!

I'm learning more & more about this machine as the days tick down, and I haven't even seen it yet. To further complicate matters, I understand that 

there's a couple of hundred pounds of what maybe be SAC307 in the bottom of the pot, was told that it was analysis was this: 96.17 % Tin, .54 % copper,
3.18 % silver. The machine is intended to be used as a 63/37 machine, and getting that residual solder out is going to be a bear because I understand that the bottom of the pot has what's called a "false bottom" or welded structure inside, so it's going to be tough. I don't think I can leave the 

solder inside the pot with hopes of adding new solder and it will dilute what's left in the pot down enough for the solder to be within spec, in fact I'm pretty sure it won't, the silver content is especially what worries me.

The previous emails from a few days ago about the tin content was with the 

existing wave that they have, now they have the -6622 coming in with this issue. Going to have my hands full when I get to Boise, that's for sure...

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Popielarski
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 12:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask] ; 'Steve Gregory'
Subject: RE: [TN] Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Below link says 700Kg = 1543.24. This might be lead-free, so I'd go with
1800 just to be safe.

http://www.smtnet.com/mart/index.cfm?fuseaction=view_item&item_id=74987


Ed Popielarski
Engineering Manager


                               970 NE 21st Ct.
                              Oak Harbor, Wa. 98277

                              Ph: 360-675-1322
                              Fx: 206-624-0965
                              Cl: 949-581-6601


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:54 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Solder pot capacity of Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC Wave solder machine

Hi All!

Does anybody know what the solder pot capacity is of a Vitronics/Soltec 6622CC wave solder machine is with tin/lead solder in it?

The reason I?m asking is because my new employer bought a used ?6622 and needs to know how much solder they should buy to be able to fill the pot. 
They have an old electrovert now that has a 500-lb pot that we?ll be using, and I told him that wouldn?t be enough to fill the Vitronics machine. I?m thinking the 6622 holds around 1,600 ?1,800 lbs., but I?m not sure...

Steve

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________ 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2