TECHNET Archives

March 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:20:59 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Hi all!

My new employer has purchased a used Vitronics-Soltec 6622 wave solder machine that supposedly still has 100-200 lbs. of lead free solder in the pot because they were told that it was difficult to remove. My new employer is intending for this wave to be run as a leaded machine.

So, what do you think about leaving that residual lead free solder in the pot and just filling it up with 63/37? I haven’t seen the machine yet (I’ve yet to get to Boise), and I’ve never seen the inside of a empty –6622 wave solder pot, so I don’t know why it would be difficult to empty the pot completely. I’ve always been able to get all of the solder out of all the pots that I have ever emptied. Does it have immersion heaters that are mounted in some sort of structure at the bottom of the pot that prevents all of the solder from being removed?

I’ve been told that a sample of the solder that was left in the pot has been sent to AIM solder for analysis, so we’ll know exactly what it is. I know that most lead free solders are mostly tin, so would it be just a matter of adding extra lead to the pot to bring everything into compliance? 

I definitely plan on getting the solder analyzed once the pot is filled and before any product is run, but I want to know if this is a bad idea? I don’t want to load up the pot with solder and learn later that the pot is contaminated and has to be drained. Sorry for all the questions but I have never taken a wave that has been run as a lead-free machine and then be converted to a leaded machine...plus I’m not yet as familiar with the pot and heater configuration of the Soltec–6622 machine as I would like to be. 

If it was the other way around (leaded ----> Lead-free) I wouldn’t even be thinking about it, NO WAY!

Steve

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2