Great news!! And, you have people offering to help defray the costs!! We from Process Effects will be back to you direct.
Denny
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
To: Dennis Fritz <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: marccarter <[log in to unmask]>; ghurst <[log in to unmask]>; sharon.ventress <[log in to unmask]>; larry.foster <[log in to unmask]>; TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wed, Mar 13, 2013 10:05 am
Subject: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)
Hi Denny,
You know what, I changed my mind. I called Homestead and talked with them, explained the issues that I had with their service, and they said that since I had been such a long time customer of theirs, they offered to reduce the fees! You don’t get that too often these days!
They still had my webpage and content, and was able to restore everything back. So it is back up: www.stevezeva.homestead.com
So it’s still here, and I will still keep this going. So if anyone still needs a picture or two posted once in a while, I’m still here. I’ve put so much time an effort into this already, I’m glad that I can continue...
Steve
From: Dennis Fritz
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc: [log in to unmask] ; [log in to unmask] ; [log in to unmask] ; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)
Steve,
I had hoped that our work on the IPC Process Effects revision - the old 740 - could use some of the pictures. Sorry they are mostly gone now. I have copied the other people working on that document.
Would you still be willing to share what you do have?
Let us know.
Denny Fritz
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]>
To: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tue, Mar 12, 2013 5:46 pm
Subject: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.)
Hi Steve,
No I do not. I have some of the images on my own computer, but not all. That
as one of the problems I was having with Homestead (aside from the ever
ncreasing fees), I couldn't back my page up and all the content on my own
omputer. I could do a back-up through only through Homestead, but couldn't
ring the content on to my own computer which I thought was strange, and
rankly pissed me off. It was one of the big reasons why I decided to pull
he plug...
Steve
-----Original Message-----
rom: Steven Creswick
ent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:47 AM
o: [log in to unmask]
ubject: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad
older slug problem.)
Either will require a some amount of time on Steve's part. I think more
ime going to the IPC site if placing in separate folders, etc.
The question is whether you still have everything or not - Steve?
Another Steve
-----Original Message-----
rom: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Victor Hernandez
ent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:11 AM
o: [log in to unmask]
ubject: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad
older slug problem.)
How about into DROPBOX?
Victor,
-----Original Message-----
rom: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Tontis, Theodore
ent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 10:00 AM
o: [log in to unmask]
ubject: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad
older slug problem.)
Guy is right,
Would it be possible to move some of the photos from Steve's sight to the
PC site?
Ted T.
-----Original Message-----
rom: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Guy Ramsey
ent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 9:57 AM
o: [log in to unmask]
ubject: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad
older slug problem.)
Gosh Steve, that site was a gold mine. Sorry to see it go.
uy
-----Original Message-----
rom: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
ent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 9:56 AM
o: [log in to unmask]
ubject: Re: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad
older slug problem.)
Hi Craig,
Sorry to say that I've closed my site down. Homestead was raising their fees
o the point that I had to think about the cost benefit that was coming from
aying for it out of my pocket. IPC started the group-share site where
mages can be posted, and I might have gotten a request or two once in a
hile over several months, so I decided to shut it down...:o(
It was a fun ride while lasted though... :o)
Steve
-----Original Message-----
rom: Craig Cullum
ent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 9:33 AM
o: [log in to unmask]
ubject: [TN] Off-topic problem (was RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder
lug problem.)
Hmm, I'm getting a "Sorry, the site you requested has been disabled" msg
hen accessing Steve's homestead site. Never had a problem before using IE9,
lthough I did recently clear temp internet and Java files.
Is anyone else having a problem?
Craig Cullum, Engineering Technologist, AMTELCO
: [log in to unmask]
: 608 838 8367
: 608 838 4194, or 4197, x128
Please visit us at www.amtelco.com
"I couldn't wait for success . . . so I went ahead without it." Jonathan
inters
"I don't rely on inspiration. It's unreliable. I just get up in the morning
nd I go to work." Nick Cave
----Original Message-----
rom: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
ent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:33 PM
o: [log in to unmask]
ubject: Re: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.
Hi Alan,
Sorry about the delay, but I got your pictures posted. The links are
ere:
http://stevezeva.homestead.com/QFN_48_pin_pry.jpg
http://stevezeva.homestead.com/QFN_48_pin_reflow.jpg
http://stevezeva.homestead.com/QFN_48_pin_x-ray.jpg
<SNIP>
______________________________________________________________________
his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
