IE9? You bet, repeatedly. I have shifted to Chrome on two of my computers.
Nearly no problems. And Mozilla on a third machine. Same, very few
problems.  Now, have you tried IE10 and IE11?  IE10 seems to be better than
IE9.

Inge

On 12 March 2013 14:33, Craig Cullum <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hmm, I'm getting a "Sorry, the site you requested has been disabled" msg
> when accessing Steve's
> homestead site. Never had a problem before using IE9, although I did
> recently clear temp internet
> and Java files.
>
> Is anyone else having a problem?
>
> Craig Cullum, Engineering Technologist, AMTELCO
> e: [log in to unmask]
> f: 608 838 8367
> v: 608 838 4194, or 4197, x128
>
> Please visit us at www.amtelco.com
>
> "I couldn't wait for success . . . so I went ahead without it." Jonathan
> Winters
>
> "I don't rely on inspiration. It's unreliable. I just get up in the
> morning and I go to work." Nick Cave
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steve Gregory
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 5:33 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Sorry about the delay, but I got your pictures posted. The links are
> here:
>
> http://stevezeva.homestead.com/QFN_48_pin_pry.jpg
>
> http://stevezeva.homestead.com/QFN_48_pin_reflow.jpg
>
> http://stevezeva.homestead.com/QFN_48_pin_x-ray.jpg
>
> <SNIP>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________