Good morning Sir Quixote,

While I do not disagree, that effort is outside the scope of what I am 
doing with just the conformal coating section of the two documents, with 
the possible exception of conformal coating over flux residues.

I will send you Rev E for your review, and the latest draft of Rev F. 
Comments against the ionic cleanliness provisions of J-STD-001 should be 
made to Dan Foster and Teresa Rowe who lead the J-STD-001 efforts. 
Comments can also be directed to Jack Crawford, the IPC liaison for that 
group.

Doug Pauls



From:   Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
To:     TechNet Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Doug Pauls 
<[log in to unmask]>
Date:   03/11/2013 06:07 AM
Subject:        Re: [TN] Conformal Coating and J1 / 610



On behalf of the Jedi Council, and manufacturer of coatings for 30 years - 
halleluyacinations!

J-STD-001 needs to be revised in respect to "ionic contamination testing" 
and to get rid of the major bugbear: thou shalt clean to a level of <1,56 
micro grammes/cm2 NaCl equivalence. As many of you will know, this has 
been a major topic of TechNet debate for some years - Brian Ellis and I 
have been doing our utmost to bring this matter to a head - now we have 
the chance.

As for A-610, the latest Rev that I have is RevD, so I will need to see 
what presently exists before I can comment further, but this would 
similarly deal with visible contaminants.

Graham Naisbitt
Chair, Co-Chair, Vice Chair - various
Jedi Council


On 7 Mar 2013, at 16:06, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]> 
wrote:

> Greetings Citizens of the Galactic Empire.  You have all been annexed 
and 
> the Republic is dissolved.  You are now all my minions.
> If you do not have an open can of toluene on YOUR desktop, you miss out 
on 
> some wonderful hallucinations.
> 
> At the recent IPC Apex meetings, as the Chairman of the Cleaning and 
> Coating groups, I was asked to tackle the conformal coat provisions in 
> IPC-J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610.  I agreed (Proof positive I am an idiot). 
> Leave it alone Dewey.  The coating groups have known for a long time 
that 
> these documents need attention, and the time is right at both of those 
> documents move towards Revision F. 
> 
> To assist the small working group that is/will be working on this over 
the 
> next 6 months, I plan on making use of this forum to gather information. 
I 
> have always been impressed by the summary wisdom of Technet.
> 
> So, first question:
> 
> 1.  With J-STD-001 and/or IPC-A-610, what areas are NOT presently 
> addressed, but need to be?
> 
> The Death Star will be dispatched to those areas not 
participating.......
> 
> Doug Pauls
> Chairman, IPC Cleaning and Coating Committees
> Galactic Emperor
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud 
service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
[log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________





______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________