TECHNET Archives

March 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 06:48:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (92 lines)
Good suggestion Lloyd.  I do have the NASA standard and will pirate / 
borrow from that.

Doug Pauls



From:   Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>
Date:   03/08/2013 02:29 PM
Subject:        Re: [TN] Conformal Coating and J1 / 610
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



Very true Larry, that is one of the biggest issues we run into when it 
comes
to coating: what needs to be coated and what doesn't.  A drawing may have 
a
red outline around a connector stating that it is to be coating free. Some
take that as everything within that red box is coating free where others
understand that the red box just identifies the connector and that only 
the
mating area of the connector (pins, sockets, latches) are to be coating
free. 

 

Doug, maybe you should look at taking some comments from the NASA 
standard.
They tend to be more specific on what is and what is not allowed. Let me
know if you need a copy.

 

Lloyd E Duso

Diamond-MT

Plant Manager

(814) 535-3505

 

 

From: Larry Dzaugis [mailto:[log in to unmask]] 
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 3:04 PM
To: Lloyd Duso
Cc: TechNet E-Mail Forum
Subject: Re: [TN] Conformal Coating and J1 / 610

 

Exactly. 
How accurately can you place the tape?
Is there a tolerance on the drawing?
There needs to be a tolerance even for the best process.
It is best if it is explicitly identified so that so some incoming 
inspector
doesn't go "this nice sharp line is not exactly as shone on the drawing"
Other processes have the sane issue and require a larger tolerance.. 

Part of Dfx is to account for variation.
If it needs to be tight, little variation will be tolerated. 
It will cost more to produce than one where the sweet spot of the process 
is
used and accounted for.
That is the trade off, identify what is required and what can be
accomplished.
Make the descion by choice, do the best you can to ameliorate any problems
and don't cry about it later because of the cost and inconvenience.
Feed back the results and change the rules if necessary.





______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________




______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2