Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:24:13 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Kevin - I disagree with that statement in the IPC-7095C and didn't
realize it was there (otherwise I would have turned in a comment during
the draft efforts). I'll make sure to bring the topic back up in the 7095
committee as we start our next set of standards revision activities.
Rockwell Collins has successfully used ENEPIG surface finishes in tin/lead
and lead-free soldering applications for several years. We are in the
process of running another test sequence with one of the DOE legs using
ENEPIG surface finish so I should have an additional data set I can
present to the 7095 committee for review in regards to the wording you
detailed. Pd has very slow diffusion/dissolution characteristics in a
soldering process so you need to make sure you accommodate those
metallurgical reactions.
But - overall- the IPC-7095C represents a huge amount of work by the
committee with tons of new information that should be very useful to the
industry.
Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]
From: "Glidden, Kevin" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 03/12/2013 04:35 PM
Subject: [TN] IPC-7095C vs IPC-4556 ENEPIG for SnPb
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Finally taking a few minutes to glance through some of the new IPC
releases...
I see a statement within IPC-7095C, specifically section 5.3.3.3, that
states ENEPIG is best suited for Pb-Free soldering, and that studies have
shown ENEPIG does not produce very reliable tin/lead solder joints, due to
the inability of Pd to alloy with lead.
I don't see any such warnings or statements in IPC -4556. Or am I missing
them? If this is true, it seems like it would be a major consideration
and would/should be included or mentioned in IPC-4556 Section 1.4.7
"Limitations of ENEPIG".
But, I could have it all wrong. So far all I have done is glance through
these new specs....
Kevin Glidden
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|