Good morning Sir Quixote,
While I do not disagree, that effort is outside the scope of what I am
doing with just the conformal coating section of the two documents, with
the possible exception of conformal coating over flux residues.
I will send you Rev E for your review, and the latest draft of Rev F.
Comments against the ionic cleanliness provisions of J-STD-001 should be
made to Dan Foster and Teresa Rowe who lead the J-STD-001 efforts.
Comments can also be directed to Jack Crawford, the IPC liaison for that
group.
Doug Pauls
From: Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
To: TechNet Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Doug Pauls
<[log in to unmask]>
Date: 03/11/2013 06:07 AM
Subject: Re: [TN] Conformal Coating and J1 / 610
On behalf of the Jedi Council, and manufacturer of coatings for 30 years -
halleluyacinations!
J-STD-001 needs to be revised in respect to "ionic contamination testing"
and to get rid of the major bugbear: thou shalt clean to a level of <1,56
micro grammes/cm2 NaCl equivalence. As many of you will know, this has
been a major topic of TechNet debate for some years - Brian Ellis and I
have been doing our utmost to bring this matter to a head - now we have
the chance.
As for A-610, the latest Rev that I have is RevD, so I will need to see
what presently exists before I can comment further, but this would
similarly deal with visible contaminants.
Graham Naisbitt
Chair, Co-Chair, Vice Chair - various
Jedi Council
On 7 Mar 2013, at 16:06, Douglas Pauls <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Greetings Citizens of the Galactic Empire. You have all been annexed
and
> the Republic is dissolved. You are now all my minions.
> If you do not have an open can of toluene on YOUR desktop, you miss out
on
> some wonderful hallucinations.
>
> At the recent IPC Apex meetings, as the Chairman of the Cleaning and
> Coating groups, I was asked to tackle the conformal coat provisions in
> IPC-J-STD-001 and IPC-A-610. I agreed (Proof positive I am an idiot).
> Leave it alone Dewey. The coating groups have known for a long time
that
> these documents need attention, and the time is right at both of those
> documents move towards Revision F.
>
> To assist the small working group that is/will be working on this over
the
> next 6 months, I plan on making use of this forum to gather information.
I
> have always been impressed by the summary wisdom of Technet.
>
> So, first question:
>
> 1. With J-STD-001 and/or IPC-A-610, what areas are NOT presently
> addressed, but need to be?
>
> The Death Star will be dispatched to those areas not
participating.......
>
> Doug Pauls
> Chairman, IPC Cleaning and Coating Committees
> Galactic Emperor
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or
[log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|