TECHNET Archives

February 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Joyce Koo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:20:15 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (140 lines)
Alan,
For 7x7mm parts with 48 lead QFN, you are more likely deal with Micro-lead-frame (MLF).  Based on 9 via holes you have in the design, I believe you need to go back to your vendor's design guide or application note (normally a separate document, not part of dwg or datasheet (might be embedded in the datasheet with small font of ask you to see "ANXXXX" etc).  Sort of one document cover all the QFN family by the vendor).  My gut feeling is somewhere, some how your vendor got a clause to ask you to plug the via (not open via). Since it is only 9 vias under the pad, possibly not that extreme heat requirement, possibly your vendor is not going to specify type to via plug method, as long as anything that prevent solder to flow down, like the situation you have.  My Friday's 1 cent guess.   Good luck.  
I suggest perform because it provide you with full coverage and little voiding possibility and usually, the perform is melt a slight higher temperature, so it is less runny down to your vias.  If only 9 vias and thermal is not extreme, the perform might do the trick as a bandaid.  Plug via would be the better way, of course... But that is after thoughts :-).  

Joyce Koo
Materials Researcher - Materials Interconnect Lab
Research In Motion Limited
Office: (519) 888-7465 79945
Mobile: (226) 220-4760

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Steven Creswick
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:28 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.

Alan,

Technically, IPC rips off any attachments you might try to add.

Send Steve Gregory a note at [log in to unmask]
To see if he has the time to post them on his site.

Alternatively, you can go to the IPC site, sign in, and create a folder of
your own that all can see if you send us the link.



Regarding the solder slug on the underside of the device.  I don't believe
you explicitly stated that you saw evidence of solder wetting to it.
Couldn't it be that the copper slug just isn't getting warm enough for the
solder to wet to it and the solder preferentially decides to wet to the
warmer vias?  Follow along with what Ted said.

Snowbound sparrow - west MI

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alan Young
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 2:12 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.

Thanks aging for all of this feedback, really appreciated!

Is it okay to attach some images to an e-mail or can I send some to somebody
so that they might be able to host them? 

Alan.

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 1:26 PM
To: [log in to unmask]; Alan Young
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RE: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.

A picture is worth one thousand words.

Victor,

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alan Young
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 11:23 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] 48-pin QFN via-in-pad solder slug problem.

Hi folks,

Please forgive me if this topic does not belong to this group.

Let me explain my predicament.
I'm a PCB layout guy who has been asked to look at a soldering issue we are
having with a 48-pin QFN 7mmx7mm [EMBER CORP - EM357-RTR], the solder slug
under the part is not soldering/bonding to the PCB. The pcb footprint is
made per the manufactures specification with a 5.3mm x 5.3mm solder slug pad
with 9 vias finished drill size of 0.254mm. There are no soldermask features
on the component or solder side over the vias.

When the board has been reflowed, all of the 48 pins solder well but the
slug has not bonded to the pcb. There are signs of solder in the slug vias
on the opposite side of the board. If the part is ripped off the board, the
slug is clean and solder free.

I do not have any information about the paste screen setup or the oven
profile.

The questions I have are;

1 - Any ideas on why this is happening?

2 - Are the vias in the slug causing this problem?

3 - Would soldermaks capping the vias on the component side help resolve
this?

4 - Would plugging (no capping) of the vias with epoxy help?

5 - Do north African sparrows fly faster then European sparrows (just seeing
if anybody is reading this :-)

I do have some photos and x-rays of the device if this will help.

Again any help or comments would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Alan Young.



This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain
legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use
of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other
use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2