TECHNET Archives

February 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Lloyd Duso <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Feb 2013 14:16:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Definitely for SW UV light. LW UV it is still a good idea. I like the UV
enhancing style that that blocks the bad UV and enhances the "glow". Kinda
like the ones the CSI guys and gals wear. Or your auto mechanic when he is
searching for an A/C leak.

Lloyd E Duso
Diamond-MT
Plant Manager
(814) 535-3505
 


-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Larry Dzaugis
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 1:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] UV lamps for inspection

At what point is protective glasses for the UV?


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2