TECHNET Archives

January 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vladimir Igoshev <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 4 Jan 2013 18:12:34 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
I'd tried  pretty much every existing mounting compound and ended up using Struers one for many years.
------Original Message------
From: Ramakrishnan Saravanan
Sender: TechNet
To: [log in to unmask]
ReplyTo: TechNet E-Mail Forum
ReplyTo: Ramakrishnan Saravanan
Subject: [TN] Hot mounting micro section of PCB
Sent: Jan 4, 2013 11:23

We are making space quality MLBs. We are using hot mounting for micro section. 
My understanding is hot mounting(Phenolic power of Buehler at 150 Deg C ,180 bar &  5 minutes)  of PCB specimen will destroy the PCB specimen Our metallographers are against using cold mounting. The reason  is they claim poor edge retention & high shrinkage   and observing faults are difficult. 

Which method of mounting is best for micro sectioning PCB ?. Which is the best resin & hardener having low shrinkage and high edge retention ?.

regards,

R.Saravanan


Regards,

Vladimir

SENTEC Testing Laboratory Inc.
11 Canadian Road, Unit 7.
Scarborough, ON M1R 5G1
Tel: (416) 899-1882
Fax: (905) 882-8812
www.sentec.ca

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2