Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:29:19 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I believe there are two sides to the "remove unused pads" argument. This topic was widely commented on some 3-4 years ago - certainly when we had Werner Engelmaier with us. Paul Ried and the IST users may also have an opinion. Consult the IPC archives.
Denny Fritz
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>
To: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thu, Jan 17, 2013 4:54 pm
Subject: Re: [TN] PCB design/build question about via construction
Yes. By all means remove un-used pads.
Bob K.
-----Original Message-----
rom: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Bealer
ent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 4:13 PM
o: [log in to unmask]
ubject: [TN] PCB design/build question about via construction
On an internal copper plane(pour) where a via intersects the plane but
oesn't connect, should we remove the pad on that plane for that via? I
ould think that it would add some measure of structural support for the via
f we left it in place. Am I wrong?
Thanks,
avid Bealer
______________________________________________________________________
his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
his email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
or more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
_____________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|