TECHNET Archives

January 2013

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Jan 2013 21:23:57 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Vargas, Stephen M" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
PCB Etch Cut
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
"Vargas, Stephen M" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
Good Afternoon:

A question regarding IPC-7711/7721, section 4.3.1 (Conductor Cut, Surface Conductors), details (in Outline section) that cut areas "are sealed with epoxy" and later detail (in Procedure) to "coat the area with epoxy if needed". Seems like a partial contradiction. Any thoughts? Class dependant? End use dependant? Thanks in advance.

Regards,
Steve Vargas


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2