TECHNET Archives

December 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Inge Hernefjord <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Dec 2012 23:03:41 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Angel (first time I write  to an angel), when I was in the SMT business we
mainly used IPC-A-600 , Acceptability of printed boards.  If it is a
military High Voltage unit, you may need to add MIL-STD-883 /
3006.1 High level output voltage
If your customer is european, there are corresponding NF, DIN, BN etc

Inge

On 5 December 2012 21:42, Reyes, Angel LAM2 4429 <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

> Hello TechNetters;
>
> Does any one know or recommend any test standard to validate performance
> and reliability for PCB (FR4 0.031" THCK) double side SMT assemblies potted
> with epoxy or polyurethane
>
> Regards,
> Angel
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2