TECHNET Archives

November 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Gregg Owens <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Nov 2012 00:12:28 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Wayne:

To my knowledge IPC standards have never specifically addressed a quantity limit (accept/defect) of flux (whether cleanable or no-clean) that can be used in the manufacturing process. The old engineering answer of "it depends" applies. The only requirement established has been on the cleanliness requirements. 

Gregg 

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Thayer, Wayne - IS
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 3:50 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] Limits on flux residue

Is there a spec somewhere which limits the amount of residue allowed for no clean processing?  I just saw a board where a BGA was about 70% "underfilled" by flux residue.  No, this was not a flux/underfill product!  A quick look at JSTD-001 Section 8 didn't seem to have specific guidance on this condition.

Wayne Thayer

________________________________

Email addresses of ITT Exelis employees have changed from itt.com to exelisinc.com. Please update your favorites and contact information to reflect these changes.

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may be proprietary and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Exelis Inc. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. Exelis Inc. accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2