TECHNET Archives

October 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE)
Date:
Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:21:18 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Top Cover Story:
IMHO, using a matrix of many varied requirements and a plethora of intangibles; CE 1155 comes out on top.
Dewey

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of May, William D (Dean) CIV NSWC Crane, GXSP
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 7:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] UR Conformal Coating

Technetters,

Checking if anyone has any experience with Arathane 5750 (formally Uralane 
5750) and Conathane CE 1155.

Any good or bad info from use seen.  Possible comparison data.

Ultimately trying to see if there looks to be any major difference if 
substituting the 1155 for the 5750 in a space application.

Thanks,

Wm. Dean May
Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter
Code GXSP, Bldg. 3287E
300 Highway 361
Crane, IN  47522-5001
Phone:  812.854.3073
DSN: 482-3073
Fax:  812.854.1174
Email: [log in to unmask]
http://www.navsea.navy.mil/nswc/crane/Lists/customerfeedback/NewForm.aspx

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2