TECHNET Archives

October 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Robert Kondner <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 4 Oct 2012 19:45:30 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Hi,

 

  The other week I had posted about broken vias on an expensive PCB with
filled vias. 

 

Well, let me inform folks about what really happened.

 

1.       There were no bad vias. The profile used  was low, only 221C at one
measured spot. They used leaded paste and lead free BGAs. 



2.       After pulling a part they found nice shiny reflowed pads and nice
round BGA balls that had never contacted.



3.       Today they fluxed and reflowed a dead board and it came back to
life.



4.       The Altera reflow process guidelines (AN 353) had errors in the
reflow tables. The Altera "Engineer" confirmed the data was good.  



Now I don't know who started this Bad Via story but my guess is a CM how
screwed up doing a profile. Better to point fingers towards the board house
is my guess Their "Engineer" thought that if parts got to 250C they would
stop working. So using leaded paste on lead free parts was a really smart
move. 

 

This is a classic case of people using data they think is good and forget to
think, ask and observe. 

 

Such a big world, so many problem to solve and so much hogwash in so many
heads.

 

Bob K.



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2