TECHNET Archives

October 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Oct 2012 15:19:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
may want to delete this

On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Louis Hart <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Keith, attached is the letter to the one customer, General Dynamics,  who
> was determined to have received PWBs mistakenly certified to MIL-PRF-55110
> as a consequence of microsections having been incorrectly prepared. The
> incorrect microsections were found during audit VQE-11-022451.
>
> This letter went to General Dynamics supplier quality assurance today, 4
> October 2012.
>
> I hope the letter is concise and clear, with no explanation required.
>  However, if you have any questions, please contact me.
>
> For their information, I am copying Compunetics' Technical Review Board
> and your colleague Lowell Sherman.
>
> Louis Hart
> Compunetics
> Monroeville, PA
> USA
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> 412-858-1232
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2