TECHNET Archives

October 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Gumpert, Ben" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Oct 2012 21:47:29 +0100
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Lee Hitchens <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Subject:
From:
Lee Hitchens <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0 (1.0)
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Hi Ben what are you comparing too? A solvent based coating or something else! Is the coating running during or just after application or during the cure process under the uv lights where it can get hot? 

Best regards 

Lee hitchens

Sent from my iPad

On 3 Oct 2012, at 21:39, "Gumpert, Ben" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Technetters,
> 
> I'm evaluating Humiseal's UV40 conformal coating, but I'm seeing wetting issues - where the coating completely runs off of vertical lead surfaces.
> 
> I see from some e-mails a couple of years ago that some of you are using this coating material, or were looking into it. Is anyone else seeing this problem, or have some suggestions to fix?
> 
> Ben
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2