TECHNET Archives

September 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Larry Dzaugis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:25:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Are there any silastics used on any of the components?
RTV's will yield acetic acids if a non electronic grade is used.
One of the the advantages is they have can fill large gaps.
Are there any component dust covers held on with this material?


On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Richard Kraszewski <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Occasionally, IC analyses are reported to have elevated levels of acetates
> and formates.   Is it the general consensus that source of these
> contamination is assumed to be the decomposition of larger molecular weight
> weak organic acids found in soldering fluxes?  I can't imagine that any
> manufacturer would actually be placing acetic or formic acids directly into
> a flux formulation. These are much too volatile and aggressive.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Rich  Kraszewski
> Senior Process Engineer
> PLEXUS
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2