TECHNET Archives

September 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Barton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Peter Barton <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:45:00 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hi Technetters,

Interesting that this question has arisen for me when there has been a question posed here on the reverse scenario in the last couple of days. Firstly, I agree with other posters that full reflow and alloy mixing must be achieved when using Lead free BGA's in a Tin Lead process. There is quite a lot of data out there supporting this.

My problem is finding research data on using a Tin/Lead BGA on an otherwise fully Lead free assembly. This appears to be much more limited. So far I have only found one paper that refers to this particular scenario and some of it's conclusions are carefully qualified. 

Assuming that all the other the packaging materials for the Tin/Lead BGA part in question are capable of surviving a suitable reflow process to successfully solder the lead free parts whilst minimising thermal input, can anyone out there comment on potential reliability issues. For information the BGA balls are 63/37 Sn/Pb and the solder paste alloy is SAC305.

Many thanks in advance,

Peter Barton






______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2