TECHNET Archives

September 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Sep 2012 11:10:28 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Occasionally, IC analyses are reported to have elevated levels of acetates and formates.   Is it the general consensus that source of these contamination is assumed to be the decomposition of larger molecular weight weak organic acids found in soldering fluxes?  I can't imagine that any manufacturer would actually be placing acetic or formic acids directly into a flux formulation. These are much too volatile and aggressive. 

Thoughts?

Rich  Kraszewski 
Senior Process Engineer
PLEXUS 
 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2