Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:06:28 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Kevin - I would not recommend using hard gold as a alternative to ENIG.
Depending on the elemental additive used in hard gold, you will have
soldering issues. Also, electroplated gold (aka hard gold) and ENIG
operate using different deposition processes. Hard gold typically is very
porous when thin which can result in solderability issues. Hard gold is
typically intended for connection applications and not soldering
applications.
Dave
"Glidden, Kevin" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
08/14/2012 11:12 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
"Glidden, Kevin" <[log in to unmask]>
To
<[log in to unmask]>
cc
Subject
[TN] PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold
Hi everyone,
We have a PCB supplier who is offering "Hard Gold" as an alternate to ENIG
finish, due to PCB size and processing capabilities. The application is
Class 3 (mil/aero). The circuit is thin FR4 and subject to SMT reflow w/
Sn63Pb37 (non RoHS) solder alloy, and moderate flexing in end application.
Can anyone offer info on the differences between the two finishes, and/or
their suitability? Is there an IPC spec (or specs) that outline "hard
gold"?
Thanks,
Kevin Glidden
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|