TECHNET Archives

August 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David D. Hillman" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:06:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (60 lines)
Hi Kevin - I would not recommend using hard gold as a alternative to ENIG. 
 Depending on the elemental additive used in hard gold, you will have 
soldering issues. Also, electroplated gold (aka hard gold) and ENIG 
operate using different deposition processes. Hard gold typically is very 
porous when thin  which can result in solderability issues. Hard gold is 
typically intended for connection applications and not soldering 
applications.

Dave



"Glidden, Kevin" <[log in to unmask]> 
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
08/14/2012 11:12 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
"Glidden, Kevin"        <[log in to unmask]>


To
<[log in to unmask]>
cc

Subject
[TN] PCB finish: ENIG vs. hard gold






Hi everyone,

We have a PCB supplier who is offering "Hard Gold" as an alternate to ENIG 
finish, due to PCB size and processing capabilities.  The application is 
Class 3 (mil/aero).  The circuit is thin FR4 and subject to SMT reflow w/ 
Sn63Pb37 (non RoHS) solder alloy, and moderate flexing in end application.

Can anyone offer info on the differences between the two finishes, and/or 
their suitability?  Is there an IPC spec (or specs) that outline "hard 
gold"?

Thanks,

Kevin Glidden


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2