TECHNET Archives

July 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Karen Tellefsen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Jul 2012 11:51:51 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
I agree, and Jack Brous's white paper tells just about the same thing. 
It's only good for statistical process control.

Karen Tellefsen - Electrical Testing
Alpha / 109 Corporate Blvd./ S. Plainfield, NJ 07080
[log in to unmask]
908-791-3069




From:   Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
To:     <[log in to unmask]>, 
Date:   07/10/2012 11:05 AM
Subject:        Re: [TN] Ionic Contamination Test for Non-clean PCBA, is 
it really necessary?
Sent by:        TechNet <[log in to unmask]>



I'm one of Kevin's "have written a book"! Ionic contamination testing on 
"no-clean" assemblies is totally meaningless unless conducted under very 
rigorous conditions for the unique purpose of statistical process 
control. This may tell you something about whether your process is 
constant or not. It will tell you absolutely nothing about the quality 
or reliability of your products.

Brian

On 10/07/2012 09:13, WTSJ-Willis Tam wrote:
> Hi Technet,
>
> We have implemented non-clean SMT and wave soldering processes for more 
than
> 10 years and there's no any issue, but recently one of our new customer
> required us to buy the Omega tester and set up the Ionic Contamination 
test
> for the non-clean PCBA, according to IPC-TM-650. 2.3.25.
>
> We feel the Ionic Contamination test might not be an appropriate test 
for the
> non-clean PCBA, but is there any technical paper or industry standard 
for
> this topic? We need some supporting documents for further discussion 
with our
> customer.
>
> Any suggestion/feedback would be appreciated.
>
> Regards
> Willis Tam
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud 
service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or 
[log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________




***** Please note that my E-Mail address has changed *****
Please address mail to me using our new [log in to unmask] address.
____________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
____________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2