TECHNET Archives

June 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Dwight Mattix <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:37:44 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
etch factor can vary quite a bit from one fab to another and also the 
specific design.

At 08:52 AM 6/20/2012, Upton, Shawn wrote:
>Ok, got my specifications, looking at IPC-2221A Figure 10-3, for 
>conductor width (see section 10.1.1 also, pages 77&79); and 
>IPC-A-600H 3.2.1 (see page 86).  It looks like "etch factor" drives 
>how much of a trapezoid one has on any given trace, although outer 
>layers (since they are plated) may have overhang.
>
>What I don't see is any qualitative numbers: ie, an etch factor of y 
>+/-z is typical for outer layers, vs w for inner layers.  Are these 
>numbers variable from vendor to vendor; and have to be called out on 
>any given FAB drawing, since there isn't a generic number to be pointed at?
>
>Shawn Upton, KB1CKT
>Test Engineer
>Allegro MicroSystems, Inc
>[log in to unmask]
>603.626.2429/fax: 603.641.5336
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
>For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
>______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2