Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 25 Jun 2012 09:14:26 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi John - the solder joint fatigue testing a fair majority of the industry
conducts is thermal cycle testing - as you detailed in your email, we
allow the solder joints to stabilize at a given temperature limit for a
specific time period. Your question focuses on a second conditioning
protocol - thermal shock testing. The IPC-9701 specification defines
thermal cycle testing as temperature transition rates below 20C per minute
and thermal shock testing as temperature transition rates greater than 20C
per minute. The failure modes for thermal cycle testing and thermal shock
testing are very different so any accelerated testing needs to replicate
the thermal conditions that your product will experience. The IPC-9701
specification can be used for both test methodologies.
Dave Hillman
Rockwell Collins
[log in to unmask]
John Nieznanski <[log in to unmask]>
Sent by: TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
06/23/2012 09:13 AM
Please respond to
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>; Please respond to
<[log in to unmask]>
To
<[log in to unmask]>
cc
Subject
[TN] solder fatigue analysis for continuously ramping temperature swings
Hello TechNet,
Has anyone had any success predicting, measuring and correlating solder
fatigue wearout for circuits that are continuously ramping up or down in
temperature (linearly) between fixed thermal limits over fixed time
periods? The fixed time periods are stable and repeatable as is the
temperature change over these periods.
As an example, a normal ramp-up time is 30 minutes and the temperature
ramps linearly from 20C to 40C. Then the temperature immediately ramps
down from 40C to 20C over the next 30 minutes. This pattern repeats.
The Engelmaier method described in IPC-D-279, IPC-SM-785 assumes cyclic
temperature swings between two fixed temperature limits. The solder joint
temperatures stabilize at each temperature limit for a fixed interval
before periodically switching to the other temperature limit for the same
interval. How can be solder fatigue wearout be quantified in solder
joints that instead of ?soaking? or stabilizing at each of the temperature
limits, are always either heating up or cooling down between these known
limits in a predictable, linear way? Intuitively, it seems that creep and
stress relaxation should be less, but how to quantify when solder joint
wearout occurs (N50, mean lifetime)?
Thanks.
John Nieznanski
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|