TECHNET Archives

June 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 1 Jun 2012 09:47:48 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I would appreciate anyone sharing their thoughts on vacuum drying of PCB's. 

What conditions do you use? (Time, temp and vacuum)

I realize it can be used to reduce required peak temperature but is there potentially any time reduction benefit to using vacuum?

I saw a paper from the "Electronic Components and Systems Division within German Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers´Association Working Group", entitled 

 "Recommendation & Guideline Values for drying for bare PCBs" 

The offered a rather paltry reduction in drying time of 60 minutes from 8 hours if vacuum was used. Doesn't seem like much of a benefit. 


Rich Kraszewski/PLEXUS 


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2