TECHNET Archives

May 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Graham Naisbitt <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 May 2012 17:29:29 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Dewey - That's shocking.

Graham N

On 11 May 2012, at 16:41, Whittaker, Dewey (EHCOE) wrote:

> Since Inge and Doug pinged me; this is Friday; and there is always an element of truth in what I say: I thought I would pass this along to show you do not suffer alone.
> We had a non-procurable part (ceramic resistor network) and I had rejected the alternate. After several meetings concerning placement, testing, signal integrity and the like we came to a plan
> I promptly told the team "Thankfully, our resistance to change did not impede our capacitance for success.
> Dewey
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
> ______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2